non-strategic nuclear weapons in Europe has declined dramatically, from a peak of more than 7,000 in the 1970s to some 200 today. NATO policy has evolved over 55 years and has increasingly stressed that the circumstances in which the Alliance might have to consider resorting to nuclear weapons are exceedingly remote. NATO, since the mid-1950s, has attached importance to nuclear weapons in deterring-and, if necessary, defending against-an attack on the Alliance. But Russia-which has a significant numerical advantage in non-strategic weapons-so far shows little enthusiasm for new negotiations on any further nuclear cuts beyond New START. When signing the New START Treaty, Obama stated that further negotiations should include nonstrategic (also referred to as tactical or sub-strategic) nuclear weapons, and a negotiation covering nonstrategic nuclear weapons would presumably include U.S. government considers how it might deal with non-strategic nuclear weapons in the context of a possible next round of U.S.-Russian arms reduction negotiations. Meeting in Lisbon in November 2010, NATO leaders issued a new Strategic Concept for the Alliance and mandated a comprehensive Deterrence and Defense Posture Review (DDPR) that will address, among other things, NATO’s nuclear posture. His speech and the U.S.-Russian negotiation that culminated in the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) spurred talk in Europe of the contribution NATO might make to the nuclear disarmament process.
Night business records strategic war heads free#
In his April 2009 speech in Prague, President Barack Obama articulated the goal of a world free of nuclear weapons while also stating that the United States would maintain an effective nuclear deterrent as long as nuclear weapons exist. It concludes with policy recommendations for Washington and NATO. This paper examines NATO’s nuclear background, lays out a number of questions the Alliance must consider as it thinks about its future nuclear posture, and outlines the range of arms control approaches for dealing with non-strategic nuclear weapons. The United States and NATO are currently weighing what to do about non-strategic nuclear weapons in the context of a major Alliance deterrence and defense policy review and the possibility of future U.S.-Russian nuclear arms reduction talks.
0 kommentar(er)
